Riskopoly

November 19, 2007

The most appropriate game for our trying times:

RISKOPOLY


The Game of Capitalist Imperialism!

(Risk and Monopoly are both registered trademarks of Parker Brothers, Inc.) “RISKOPOLY” and its rules are the property of Daniel M. Haley
Copyright 1975, 1996 All rights reserved.

Riskopoly is a combination of the games Risk and Monopoly. Though played as a board game, Riskopoly is actually a game of negotiation, cunning, economics, and politics. As model of the “real world” Riskopoly goes far beyond its venerated parent games. The formal rules of Riskopoly are actually just a framework. The real rules are those that govern global warfare and international business. The game is best when played creatively — and always remember EXTORTION IS LEGAL!

http://www.gilwood.org/riskopoly.htm

You’d better have all day — or at least until the End of History — to play.


train stories

November 19, 2007

Everyone in the big city’s got ‘em.

This morning:

A scruffy man shambles on to the bus, picking at the inch-long dreads curling from his scalp. He sits down across from me, removes his shoe, and begins rubbing his foot inside a decaying gym sock.

“That’s all there is to it,” he muttered to himself as I exited the train.

The chills don’t hit me until I start up “Waiting For Godot” for my 8 AM class.  A coincidence too trite to be believed; yet the thought hits me instantly: how did he know?

This afternoon:

I instantly recognize the sweet vomit smell: the young woman sitting next to me has Dmitri Gin on her breath at 2:30 in the afternoon. At the mercy of the rancid odor, like pickled body odor with a hint of pine, her mints are useless.


Trust, pt. 3

November 9, 2007

 

MULTIPLE CHOICE

 

Pick the choice that BEST answers the question or completes the statement

1. Trust is ______________________.

a. a benefit concert

b. a smiling middle-aged white man

c. a smiling middle-aged white woman

d. a gun


Trust, pt. 2

November 9, 2007

Things I Do Not Trust (in no particular order)

  1. Corporations large and small
  2. Organic Foods
  3. People who buy organic food
  4. Anything on TV
  5. People who trust anything on TV
  6.  People who proudly proclaim The Daily Show as their only source of news
  7. The benevolent owners of social networking sites
  8. People who call for the benevolent owners of social networking sites to censor speech
  9. Anyone calling for benevolent higher ups to censor speech
  10. Russia
  11. China
  12. The U.S.
  13. Excessive self-disclosure
  14. Slavoj Zizek
  15. Jeff Koons
  16. Teetotalers
  17. Moderates
  18. Computer software
  19. 27-inch Zeniths
  20. Justin Timberlake
  21. The Music press
  22. The press in general
  23. Banks
  24. Conflict avoidance
  25. Economists
  26. The Economist
  27. My turntable needles
  28. Vegans
  29. Hybrid cars
  30. Cars in general
  31. Bio-fuel’s a scam too
  32. Bono
  33. Google
  34. John Edwards strikes me as particular disingenuous
  35. People who build their resumes
  36. Fair-trade coffee
  37. Ethical consumer products in general
  38. Bosses and supervisors
  39. People really into fantasy like Lord of the Rings and shit
  40. People into classic rock
  41. People into modern rock
  42. People who don’t like movies with subtitles
  43. People who pathologize those who disagree with them
  44. Anyone under 30, myself included

Trust, pt. 1

November 9, 2007

 

Trust is a relationship of reliance. A trusted party is presumed to seek to fulfill policies, ethical codes, law and their previous promises.

Trust does not need to involve belief in the good character, vices, or morals of the other party. Persons engaged in a criminal activity usually trust each other to some extent.

 

 

A critical element in studies of trust behavior is power. One who is in a position of dependence cannot be said to trust another in a moral sense, but can be defined as trusting another in the most strict behavioral sense. Trusting another party when one is compelled to do so is sometimes called reliance, to indicate that the belief in benevolence and competence may be absent, while the behaviors are present. Others refer only to coercion.

 

 

 

Every brand is a promise. How will yours be kept?

 

Marketers need to uncover the subconscious emotional motivators that are not apparent with more superficial market research methods. They simply must sample emotions, not people. It’s critical to look at undercurrents in emotions and how these affect consumer behaviors and decisions. Marketing success depends on knowing the nature of consumers’ emotional reactions instead of sampling their surface opinions.

 

 

 

Trust is an abstract concept whose definition can differ based on the individual. However, when it comes to brand trust in international markets, it can mean only one thing. International companies need to ensure that foreign consumers have trust for their brand if they want to have successful relationships with their customers.

 

Every brand makes promises. Following through on the promise builds a brands image, just as failing to deliver can forever bury a brand.